| QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE PATIENTS |
|
The Catquest-9SF questionnaire
A questionnaire, the Catquest, was developed using classical test theory by
the Swedish National Cataract Register in 1994. The questions had been
picked out through a pre-study in cataract patients using 37 questions about
daily life activities. The questions chosen for the questionnaire were the
most decisive questions, concerning activities frequently performed,
weighted high by the patients, and affected by a cataract extraction1.
The Catquest questionnaire was shown to have a good validity and a high
reliability2 according to classical test theory. In Catquest a
certain score sum before surgery was compared to a certain score sum after
surgery in each area of evaluation and individually for each patient3.
Many studies were performed by use of the Catquest questionnaire.4-12
|
|
References, Catquest and Catquest-9SF. 2. Lundström M, Roos P, Jensen S, Fregell G. Catquest questionnaire for use in cataract surgery care: Description, validity and reliability. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997;23:1226-1236.
3. Lundström M, Stenevi U, Thorburn W, Roos P. Catquest questionnaire for
use in cataract surgery care: Assessment of surgical outcomes. J Cataract
Refract Surg 1998;24:968-974.
6. Lundström M, Stenevi U, Thorburn W. Cataract surgery in the very elderly.
J Cataract Refractive Surg. 2000;26:408-414. 11. Lundström M & Wendel E. Duration of self-assessed benefit of cataract extraction – a long-term study. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:1017-1020. 12. Lundström M, Albrecht S, Nilsson M, Åström B. Patients benefit from bilateral same-day cataract extraction – a randomised clinical study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32:826-830. 13. Lundström M, Pesudovs K. Catquest-9SF patient outcomes questionnaire. Nine-item short-form Rasch-scaled revision of the Catquest questionnaire. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:504-513. 14. Lundström M, Behndig A, Kugelberg M, Montan P, Stenevi U, Pesudovs K. The outcome of cataract surgery measured with the Catquest-9SF. Acta Ophthalmol. 2011 Dec;89(8):718-23. |
| Last uppdate 2011-12-05 |